Tag Archive for: Council on American Islamic Relations

Press Release: Sentencing is a stark reminder of the global Islamist threat.

PRESS RELEASE
American Islamic Forum for Democracy

Contact: Mischel Yosick
480 225 7473 mischel@zliberty.com

May 10, 2017

Sentencing of Indonesian Christian Governor of Jakarta on blasphemy charge is a reminder of the rising global Islamist threat.

The American Islamic Forum for Democracy (AIFD) condemned the sentencing of an Indonesian Christian politician, Basuki Tjahaja Purnama, for “blasphemy.” The sentencing of Mr. Basuki, the Jakarta governor, also known as “Ahok” was heavier than what prosecutors asked for – rather than the two years probation they requested, he was sentenced to two years in prison.

M. Zuhdi Jasser, M.D., founder and president of AIFD, released the following statement:

“The fact that Mr. Basuki was even brought up on charges of ‘blasphemy’ – a truly invented ‘crime’ – is horrifying. The reality of his sentencing should alarm all people, not just Christians, and not just Indonesians.

Indonesia has long enjoyed the reputation of being a model of Muslim moderation and pluralism, yet its problem of Islamism is real: from soaring rates of female genital mutilation (FGM) to violent protests against authors and artists for ‘blasphemy,’ the country is undergoing an ugly and dangerous radicalization that will hurt, kill, and traumatize its citizens and leak across its borders, threatening global security. Mr. Basuki was a governor whose election had only improved Indonesia’s global reputation. His sentencing proves that those who are loyal to Islamist forces no longer care about upholding this image for Indonesia, instead they seek a more sinister role in the world.

Ahok’s case again proves that the nation is on the front lines of this global existential battle against Islamism.

We urge Indonesian citizens to challenge their religious establishments – particularly the Nahdlatul Ulama – to take swift and bold action to condemn and dis-empower those who support and promote punishments for blasphemy, and to demand that their government do the same. I visited Indonesia during my time on the U.S. Commission for International Religious Freedom, and know that this evil does not represent them. Their government must do better to protect and represent the will of its people.”

– ### –

M. Zuhdi Jasser, M.D. is a guest on Arizona Originals with Jason Issak

Dr. Zuhdi Jasser – American Islamic Forum for Democracy and Physician

Today’s guest, Dr. Zuhdi Jasser, has served as a US Navy physician, was hand selected to serve for two years as one of three attending physicians for the US Congress (including the US Supreme Court Justices), and has practiced medicine in Arizona.

Click here to listen to the podcast.

 

 

 

5/5/2017 : M. Zuhdi Jasser, M.D. joins Fox Business’ Making Money discussing refugees and how the influx into the U.S. has decreased under President Trump and the importance of ideological vetting.

5/4/2017: M Zuhdi Jasser, M.D. joins i24 News’ discussing the recent meeting of President Trump and Mahmoud Abbas and the anti-Semitic programs on Palestinian TV and other outlets.

5/4/2017 – M. Zuhdi Jasser sounds off on the female genital mutilation case.

Dr. Zuhdi Jasser on FBI Director James Comey addressing the arrest of two doctors accused of female genital mutilation

 

What did Imam Yaser Ali actually say on July 28, 2014 at the Eid Sermon?

AIFD STAFF NOTE:  

Locally, a recent controversy began when Imam Yaser Ali  called out AIFD President, Zuhdi Jasser’s work during his Eid Sermon of July 28, 2014 at the Islamic Center of the Northeast Valley. Though he didn’t mention Dr. Jasser’s name, the subject of his sermon was unmistakable. This necessitated a subsequent response from Dr. Jasser on the editorial pages of the Arizona Republic on August 24, 2014.

Since its publication, Mr. Ali’s allies with ICNEV are trying to rewrite history and advance the deception that Mr. Ali was not referring to Dr. Jasser at all. Subsequently, Syed Umar wrote in a letter to the editor, “the speech did not mention Zuhdi at all, but Zuhdi is assuming that he is among the people that do such things.”  They have also taken to trashing Dr. Jasser with name calling and ad hominem attacks available in the comments section of the piece and also in the letters to the editor. Omar Odeh of Scottsdale wrote in the Arizona Republic, “Not once did Yaser Ali mention Jasser’s name. Jasser is the one that made this about himself…Jasser for as long as I’ve known him comes off a pompous, arrogant, and self-righteous individual”.  Naser Ahmad, a past President of ICNEV made the laughable claim,  “I was present in the same gathering, and contrary to what Zuhdi Jasser states, the speech had nothing to do with him. As a matter of fact, after the prayer meeting, I commended Yaser Ali on tackling a topic that I, too, feel very strongly about — that Muslims needed to study their religion, understand its dictates and then define themselves rather than just complaining about their negative portrayal in the media due to the misguided actions of some Muslim groups.

We post the following facts and detailed analysis to shed more light on what Mr. Ali actually said for anyone who may have been swayed by the rush of Ali’s supporters running for cover under the shroud of deception. The facts should leave no doubt that Mr. Ali’s sermon did in fact target Dr. Jasser. His cowardice and calculus in avoiding Dr. Jasser’s name is proven in the rush of mosque leadership to deny what was an obvious attack upon Dr. Jasser in his sermon. The saddest element is the profound dishonesty exhibited by those who deny the reality of the bully pulpit and Ali’s message on July 28, 2014. For a prayer leader to exploit the bully pulpit to suffocate dissent is one thing, but then to see his community rush to lie and hide behind vagaries afterwards is even more shameful. We at AIFD believe that the first step necessary for genuine reform is honesty then followed by public debate and dissent.

TRANSCRIPT OF EXCERPT REFERRING TO DR JASSER

The following is transcribed from the 5 minute excerpt of Imam Yaser Ali’s sermon of July 28, 2014 at ICNEV which includes the portion relevant to his admonishments against Dr. Jasser and AIFD.

“But as we enjoy this day, let’s not forget our brothers and sisters who are struggling.  The prophet (pbuh) said that, he said [Arabic]. That the believers are like one body.  When the eye hurts, the whole body hurts.  When the head hurts the whole body hurts.  When you have a headache, you can’t just be chillin’.  You got a headache. Your whole body becomes unable to do anything, and this is the example the believers are like one body.

Those who aren’t concerned about our brothers and sisters. They are not from amongst us. Today there is an entire industry that is vilifying Islam and vilifying Muslims. And saying that Muslims are the aggressors, Muslims are the terrorists, well in fact, so many Muslims are the victims all across the world.  And we need to understand this. We need to make du’aa for this. There are people who are paid, even Muslims, who go on Fox News and speak ill against Muslims–who speak ill against our Muslim brothers and sisters.  And we need to ask ourselves, this is something that is really a problem, and we can’t just complain, but we need to ask ourselves, do we love Islam more than they hate it?

We should ask ourselves this question.  Do we love Islam more than they hate it?  People have spent their careers attacking Islam. The Islamophobia industry is huge today.  And their whole job is to vilify Muslims–make them look bad.  Make the masajid, look bad.  Well, in fact, how do we respond? Not just by complaining, but by taking proactive steps. By learning our deen (religion), right?  If we are not able to articulate and respond points to these people, we need to learn our deen. We need to study our Qur’an.  We need– there are so many– we need to come to the Mosque, we need to build positive Muslim communities. Invite our colleagues, our neighbors and say: “they don’t represent us”.  “They don’t represent us”. We, the Muslim community represent one another.

And we care for our brothers and sisters in Palestine deeply.  And that is why we have these petitions for you. That’s why we have these petitions because we care about our brothers and sisters who are being oppressed in Syria and Palestine in different parts of the world.  We ask Allah SWT to have mercy on them. We need to pool our communal resources to do better responses against this Islamophobia industry that main stream media.  We have people who are very eloquent.  We have people who are good writers.  We need to use these things.  You know, write up opeds to the newspaper instead of just posting Facebook statuses, right?  We need to engage, interact with our communities and inshallah engage our representatives, and most importantly we need to learn our deen.  The most important thing is we need to learn our Qur’an.  We don’t know what our Qur’an says.  So when they mis-quote our Qur’an, we are not able to respond.  So inshallah let’s all make that niyah (intention). Let’s all make that intention that I am going to study my religion. I am going to make my children and teach them my religion and then use whatever gifts Allah SWT has given, me for the sake of deen.

Everyone has that intention inshallah? (audience responds “inshallah”). So let’s make that our intention.  And if you can’t do it, but Allah blessed you with wealth, then support these institutions.  Support these institutions, these masajid, those advocacy organizations like CAIR and others who are supporting Muslims and Muslim civil rights around the country.  We need to support these groups.”

 

TRANSCRIPT EXCERPT WITH AIFD EXPLANATION

The following is again the above 5 minute excerpt however with inserted comments from AIFD highlighting and explaining the obvious suggestions which Mr. Ali was making.

[ALI] “But as we enjoy this day, let’s not forget our brothers and sisters who are struggling.  The prophet (pbuh) said that, he said [Arabic]. That the believers are like one body.  When the eye hurts, the whole body hurts.  When the head hurts the whole body hurts.  When you have a headache, you can’t just be chillin’.  You got a headache. Your whole body becomes unable to do anything, and this is the example the believers are like one body.”

[AIFD] This is a reference to the Islamic concept of the Ummah,, or faith community. The word (absent any reform) also means nation state. Any Muslim who deviates from the ummah (or nation) leadership in dissent is considered a traitor. In order to make claims of treason (riddah) or hypocrisy (munafiq). Religious leaders often refer to this hadith (saying of the Prophet Muhammad) which compares the ummah to one body. The implication is that anyone who deviates from the ummah leadership is sickening the body. He follows this with more clarity about whom he is referring.

[ALI] “Those who aren’t concerned about our brothers and sisters. They are not from amongst us. Today there is an entire industry that is vilifying Islam and vilifying Muslims. And saying that Muslims are the aggressors, Muslims are the terrorists, well in fact, so many Muslims are the victims all across the world. And we need to understand this. We need to make du’aa for this.”

[AIFD] In the past several days, members of the mosque have written letters to the editor and exchanged communications asserting that Dr. Jasser “listened to a different sermon,” and that it was irrational for him to say Yaser Ali was referencing him in his sermon. The attempts at trying to make Dr. Jasser look dishonest reveal their panicked hypocrisy. He first discussed the ummah. Then clearly states that “they are not from amongst us”. The ‘they’ are obviously Muslims who are ‘not concerned’. The ‘us’ is necessary to make it clear that the Muslim he is referencing is part of the ummah  but is ‘not from amongst us’ (or a hypocrite). If Mr. Ali was not referring to the local Dr. Jasser who happened to be in the audience, then he and his supporters should provide a few names of other obvious Muslims to whom he may be referring. Remember, the names should be so obvious that the audience would all know about whom he is referring. The other question is if he was not referring to Dr. Jasser, how did this topic become such an important one for the Scottsdale Mosque? Was Scottsdale experiencing a groundswell of other rebellious Muslims trying to divide the community in a fitna (division) so they needed this admonishment during the widely attended family oriented holiday sermon?

For additional context regarding Mr. Ali’s comment about ‘those who aren’t concerned about our brothers and sisters’: during the week preceding this sermon,  groundwork had been laid in local social media (of many attendees of the mosque) that Dr. Jasser’s appearance 4 days earlier on a Fox News program did not demonstrate adequate concern for Palestinians due to his scathing critique of Hamas. Supporters of Yaser Ali had directly confronted Dr. Jasser’s family and friends about his so-called ‘bias and abandonment of Palestinians’ during that interview. The truth was that I had started my comments on Fox speaking to the fact that the profound suffering of the Palestinian people was real and was primarily the fault of Hamas. The unmistakable conclusion is that criticism of Hamas equates to antipathy towards Palestinians and all Muslims—such is the mantra of Muslim Brotherhood type ideologues. 

[ALI] “There are people who are paid, even Muslims, who go on Fox News and speak ill against Muslims–who speak ill against our Muslim brothers and sisters.”

[AIFD] Now just in case anyone missed his point or had any doubt about whom exactly he was talking, he further underscores the fact he is particularly talking about a Muslim who is not part of the ummah, (a Muslim who goes on enemy media). He states,“even Muslims who go on Fox News”. Especially in Scottsdale Arizona that doesn’t leave much room for guessing. Fox has few if any commentators who are Muslim besides Dr. Jasser due to the rarity of conservative Muslim voices of reform.He also makes a false assertion with no evidence that the said Muslim is paid, which is typical rhetoric for Islamists who wish to harm the reputation of Muslims who dissent – they assert we are paid agents (I am not a paid Fox News contributor). He then continues, “and speak ill against Muslims—who speak ill against our brothers and sisters”. ‘Speak ill’ obviously implies that Dr. Jasser is tarring the community—more implications about deviating from the ummah.

[ALI] “And we need to ask ourselves, this is something that is really a problem, and we can’t just complain, but we need to ask ourselves, do we love Islam more than they hate it?”

[AIFD] Now after Mr. Ali has made it clear that he is speaking about Dr. Jasser, he asks the question, “do we love Islam more than they hate it?” drawing the obvious conclusion from the statement he just made about Muslims who speak ill of other Muslims — that Dr. Jasser must hate Islam and his listeners in this holiday audience must love it. Ali draws the line: Dr. Jasser (the hater) is one of “them,” and not one of “us” (the we).

[ALI] “People have spent their careers attacking Islam. The Islamophobia industry is huge today. And their whole job is to vilify Muslims–make them look bad.  Make the masajid, look bad.  Well, in fact, how do we respond? Not just by complaining, but by taking proactive steps. By learning our deen (religion), right?  If we are not able to articulate and respond points to these people, we need to learn our deen. We need to study our Qur’an. “

[AIFD] The obvious implication here is that the Muslim he was speaking about does not know his religion and if anyone is going to refute him and the “Islamophobia industry” then they just need to learn their religion and Qur’an. CAIR’s constant libelous mantra against Dr. Jasser is that he is part of the so-called “Islamophobia industry. Again, no other Muslim is identified by CAIR as part of this Islamophobia industry. So when Mr. Ali refers to a Muslim within the ummah who is not one of us and then to the Islamophobia industry he’s obviously participating in CAIR’s campaign against Dr. Jasser. Any denial of that is laughable. Again, if Mr. Ali denies this, he needs to identify other Muslims known to the Scottsdale community to whom this may apply.

[ALI]“We need– there are so many– we need to come to the Mosque, we need to build positive Muslim communities. Invite our colleagues, our neighbors and say: “they don’t represent us”.  “They don’t represent us”. We, the Muslim community represent one another.”

[AIFD] This is the crux of the argument he is making against “those Muslims who speak ill of the community”. He implores the community to tell everyone that “they don’t represent us” – “they don’t represent us’ (said twice) Once again, he is defining “the Muslim community” as a separate entity of which Dr. Jasser has no part.

Further context: to those who still believe these comments do not or may not refer to Dr. Jasser. Let us look at the response of known local antagonists to the AIFD. Very shortly after the sermon concluded later that day on the Eid holiday itself, Dr. Matt Masalkhi (a local anesthesiologist) started a Whatsapp (mobile chat) session in which he included over 50 local Muslims. The group was entitled “No to the Zionists within,” and he opened the discussion with: “Hello everyone, I heard about what transpired at ICNEV yesterday. Kudos to the imam for his comments about the last appearance of Dr. Jasser on Fox Channel. Enough is enough and somebody should have the guts to say it as it is. He is a Zionist by definition. And we should not be pacifiers or practice silence of the lambs. Please stop supporting him.” Another Muslim from ICNEV, Mr. Tarif Jaber, also on the heels of the related sermon called for “what we can do is  make sure he does (not sic) identify himself as a representative of the Muslim community in Phoenix and/or Arizona when he appears on Fox News or similar media channels. As suggested earlier by Imam Yaser Ali, an official petition should be signed by members of all mosques in Phoenix indicating that he does not represent anyone but himself. The petitions can also be posted in official local news papers and other media.” He later added, “action, action, action,”  A Sam Alnajjar wrote, “I think you need the masjids of Phoenix to write that he doesn’t represent the Muslim community in general and just his organization” Further, participants planned actions against me, such as leaving tables when I would approach at a social function, ostracizing my family and so on. The conversation was hostile and mentioned me several times. We provide two screenshots, below. (Note: it appears Mr. Jaber meant to say “make sure he does not”, not “make sure he does”, in reference to Dr. Jasser representing Phoenix-area Muslims.

whatsapp excerpt

[ALI] “And we care for our brothers and sisters in Palestine deeply.  And that is why we have these petitions for you. That’s why we have these petitions because we care about our brothers and sisters who are being oppressed in Syria and Palestine in different parts of the world.  We ask Allah SWT to have mercy on them. We need to pool our communal resources to do better responses against this Islamophobia industry that main stream media.  We have people who are very eloquent.  We have people who are good writers.  We need to use these things.  You know, write up opeds to the newspaper instead of just posting Facebook statuses, right?  We need to engage, interact with our communities and inshallah engage our representatives, and most importantly we need to learn our deen.  The most important thing is we need to learn our Qur’an.  We don’t know what our Qur’an says.  So when they mis-quote our Qur’an, we are not able to respond.  So inshallah let’s all make that niyah (intention). Let’s all make that intention that I am going to study my religion. I am going to make my children and teach them my religion and then use whatever gifts Allah SWT has given, me for the sake of deen.”

[AIFD] Again here he is still speaking about the same issue and now moving from activism toward community resources stating“pooling resources to do better responses against the Islamophobia industry. Everyone has that intention inshallah? (audience responds “inshallah”). Their group promise of inshallah (God willing) is confirming their intent to dedicate resources and activism toward combating the “Islamophobia industry” as defined by CAIR.  Quite telling is that he then made the link abdundantly clear giving the highest endorsement of CAIR’s work in this field by giving a direct fundraising pitch for CAIR an organization known to be at odds with Dr. Jasser over the very issue of Islamophobia. It is quite telling that Ali’s only fundraising pitch is for CAIR, an organization hatched from Hamas in 1994 and remains persona non-grata with the FBI due to its position on Hamas. CAIR, in fact recently refused to debate Dr. Jasser at Georgetown in an open letter. CAIR named Dr. Jasser as a key leader of the “Islamophobia Industry” in their last report. Contrary to Mr. Ali’s cowardly denials, no other Muslims were identified in that report.

[ALI] So let’s make that our intention. And if you can’t do it, but Allah blessed you with wealth, then support these institutions.  Support these institutions, these masajid (mosques), those advocacy organizations like CAIR and others who are supporting Muslims and Muslim civil rights around the country. We need to support these groups.

[AIFD] His transition from a discussion about Dr. Jasser to fundraising for CAIR, an organization which has put out countless press releases and reports libeling Dr. Jasser also speaks to the evidence that Dr. Jasser is the target of this sermon. Imam Shqeirat in Tempe had a poster up in his mosque produced by CAIR identifying the “inner core” of the Islamophobia network and it had a photo of Dr. Jasser featured. When asked by prominent Muslims to remove it last April, Shqeirat refused. The oped notes that the Tempe mosque had a similar sermon in May, attacking Dr. Jasser given by Hussam Ayloush, executive director of CAIR-LA. Mr. Ali’s endorsement and fundraising for CAIR directly links this sermon and his political activism to CAIR’s work against Dr. Jasser.

After the above analysis any denial about what Mr. Ali was really talking about would be laughable from anyone whether antagonists or neutral toward AIFD or Mr. Ali.

CAIR Attacks AIFD through Russian Media

Earlier this year, Dr. Jasser was interviewed by Fox News regarding the Department of Justice’s decision to embrace greater flexibility for its religious members, specifically by permitting certain types of religious dress or appearance to be maintained while in uniform. To see that interview, click here.

Following that interview, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) began another shameful round of attacks against Dr. Jasser. To see those attacks and our full response, click here. 

Despite our many refutations of CAIR’s baseless attacks, they continued (and continue to) smear our work. We even invited CAIR to a public debate on “Islamophobia in America,” with a neutral moderator and venue. They declined our invitation. To see that exchange and our analysis, click here.

Most recently, Dr. Jasser was contacted by Voice of Russia, who had spoken with CAIR about the Department of Justice’s policies. Most revealing was CAIR’s choice to attack Dr. Jasser and AIFD through Russian media, even attempting to pose a question to Dr. Jasser through them.

To read what Voice of Russia published, please click here.

Since the final piece was understandably brief, we thought we would share Dr. Jasser’s interview in its entirety. Below, we have posted Voice of Russia’s questions to Dr. Jasser and the full responses he sent back.

 **

Voice of Russia]: Questions for: US Commission on International Religious Freedom, Vice Chair for the organization Dr. Zuhdi Jasser

Dr. Jasser: First note that ethically you do not define the capacity in which I act during a media interview. I do. During the Fox interview in question and during this interview I am speaking to you on my own behalf as well as President of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy. If you are interested in our work specifically during my past two years of service on USCIRF, you are welcome to contact USCIRF and avail yourself of the publicly available work there which I have participated in during my tenure thus far as a USCIRF commissioner since 2012.

[VOR]: The Council on American-Islamic Relations released a press release after Dr. M. Zuhdi Jasser appeared on Fox News. The council was disgusted by the words that you (Dr. Jasser) said on national TV … as according to CAIR, the International Religious Freedom Vice Chair did not think it was a good idea to broaden the religious freedoms for Muslim military personnel— to what degree is it fair to allow any type of religious follow practice their faith in the US military?

The Council on American-Islamic Relations welcomes the new policy which has broadened the religious rights, Dr. Jasser, how come CAIR states that you are so much against this policy?

Dr. Jasser:  CAIR claims that I am against religious rights being granted for Muslims in the military because they have a very flexible relationship with the truth. My words stand on their own merit. Any honest human being that reviews my comments will know that not only am I not against this new policy, I actually welcomed it publicly – both in the Fox interview over which they attacked me, and in multiple publications and statements after the fact. Unfortunately, the only way CAIR knows how to advance their agenda is to maliciously misrepresent my position in order to defame me in the eyes of other Muslims. It is a desperate and obvious attempt to damage AIFD’s work as we gain more support in the Muslim community. Rather than confront the issue of Islamism and its threat to Islamic reform and true religious freedom, CAIR operates under the premise that any Muslims who call them out and disagree with their Islamist agenda must be “anti-Islam” or “Islamophobic” and thus not a “good Muslim” by their standards. Their behavior smacks of takfirism (the insinuation that other Muslims are not devout enough and thus anti-Islam).

VOR]: It has been noted that you are a devout Muslim which means you actively practice your religion.  To what degree would you be alright with Muslims in the military growing out their beards as a way of showing dedication to their faith?

Dr. Jasser: As was stated in our response to CAIR’s attacks which I hope you read, religious accommodations must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis with priority given to mission readiness and unit cohesion. As a veteran of the U.S. Navy and as a practicing Muslim, I found no conflict between practice of my personal faith (including fasting, praying, abstention from alcohol and dating) and my service in the military. Whether or not a beard is an absolute religious requirement is something we Muslims should be able to discuss reasonably.  The beard as described in the sunnah is not even worn by many in CAIR’s leadership, so it is curious that they are so adamant about it as a religious requirement. I will point out that in that interview I did not even explicitly say that men should be forbidden from having beards.  One thing many seem to be forgetting is that a career in the military is not one for those who want limitless personal expression through their appearance. I applaud the military for looking at these more inclusive policies, but also understand that the uniform is meant to create some amount of visual uniformity. I continue to ask that commanding officers be protected from organizations like CAIR who will insert themselves into command decisions to either allow or deny any special religious dress request.

VOR]: During an interview I had with Ibrahim Hooper, the spokesperson for CAIR, he has posed the question to you: How can you defend religious freedom in this organization while decrying religious freedoms for Muslims in the American military?

Dr. Jasser: It is truly stunning – and revealing – that a CAIR official asked me, another American, to defend my position on religious liberty by asking me a question through Russian state media- a foreign media arm of an autocratic state which by the way has great incentive in misrepresenting my positions due to the stance I have taken against the Assad regime and Russia’s support of their genocide from the beginning of their Revolution in 2011.  The simple answer is: Mr. Hooper, as any person with basic literacy and comprehension skills can easily verify, I have never “decried religious freedoms for Muslims in the American military.” This is a dishonest assertion, but as I have said before, CAIR’s inability to engage with integrity is not unexpected, and their desire to silence the urgently needed ideological battle within the Muslim community is legion. I not only stand behind my comments but my eleven years of service in the US Navy as a proud American Muslim.

VOR]: It has been over a month since CAIR has made its press release public, can you give a reason or reasons as to why you have not given any direct response to the organization?

Dr. Jasser: I wonder if Voice of Russia has verified this allegation, or if you have simply taken CAIR’s word for it? First, CAIR’s press release was just that – a press release, a public attack. They were not entitled to a personal response from me, but my organization did indeed publish a response within a few days. A link to that response is here, and is posted prominently on our website. CAIR officials have been made aware of our response. Various members of their staff have taken to social media to attack me, calling me an “Uncle Tom” and even a “monkey.” You can in fact follow my twitter timeline and see that engagement with their leadership. You could easily find my organization engaging CAIR officials on these very issues, and you could also easily find interviews in which I address these issues. Not a one has engaged me on substance – they have merely resorted to ad hominem attacks and untruths. Finally, I have challenged CAIR to a thoughtful public debate on multiple occasions and have received no response. Private conversations with leaders of an organization whose modus operands are through the dissemination of fabrications and deception are a waste of time and do nothing to hold them accountable and honest. We have always been willing to engage their leadership in public substantive conversations.

VOR]: Can there ever be a truce or common understanding between your involvement with religious freedom organizations and CAIR’s activities within the Islamic community?

Dr. Jasser: As long as CAIR continues to lie about my relationship to my faith and my community, and as long as they continue their malicious attacks against Muslims who seek to advance liberty and freedom,  no, there cannot be a “truce.” By the way, intra-faith “truces” within an American faith community over deep ideological disagreements are not best broached by the state media apparatus of a foreign autocracy like Russia. It would seem that CAIR feigns being focused on domestic civil rights of Muslims in the U.S. while spending most of its time engaging foreign media of autocratic states from Saudi Arabia to Iran and now Russia to perpetuate false information about other American Muslims.

VOR]: Islam is said to be a religion of peace, how can opposing organizations (in this instance the one you stand for and CAIR), promote peace and harmony for the same exact cause if there is so much conflict between the two groups?

Dr. Jasser: This is a peculiar question, as it seems to suggest that Muslims ourselves are a monolith. As I have explained repeatedly in my decades of work for religious freedom and peace, there is a conflict within the “House of Islam,” between those who truly support the separation of mosque and state both when we are minorities in a country and in countries where we are a majority — and those who would ultimately welcome an Islamic state or global caliphate. I delve into this in my 2012 book, A Battle for the Soul of Islam: An American Muslim Patriot’s Fight to Save his Faith. I do not believe that CAIR stands for “the same exact cause” as I do. An organization like CAIR which sends letters to corrupt thuggish dictators like Muammar Qaddafi, fawning over him and what they called his exemplary Islamic behavior is hardly an organization with which I am going to find much common ground. As I said in my response to CAIR’s press release: if we want the military and the broader American community to truly embrace the contribution of American Muslims, we must reject the bullying tactics of organizations like CAIR, who claim to advocate for civil rights but really peddle a narrative of ceaseless victimhood while denigrating and libeling any Muslims who seek balance against the threat of Islamist ideologies.  Their approach belittles true transgressions against religious liberty and in fact ostracizes those Muslims who bravely serve our country. Millions of liberal Egyptian Muslims protested the Muslim Brotherhood leadership and their Islamist theocratic policies last year. Rational observers would not say that those liberal Muslims who rose against the Islamists last June were “anti-Muslim”. Those anti-Islamist Muslim voices deserve respect and honest debate whether in Egypt, the United States, or Russia.